Multicentre retrospective study finds high rates of severe complications requiring revision after OAGB with fixed BPL in patients.
Background One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a widely performed bariatric procedure. The length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) is a key determinant of weight loss and metabolic effect, but excessively long limbs may predispose to malabsorptive complications. Long-term outcome data for fixed long BPLs remain limited. Objective To evaluate long-term severe complications requiring revisional surgery following OAGB with a fixed biliopancreatic limb length of 250 cm. Methods This multicentre retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients who underwent primary OAGB with a 250-cm BPL between 2010 and 2020. Data were extracted from hospital electronic and paper records. Patients were invited for a structured clinical and biochemical assessment. Severe complications were predefined and reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. Outcomes of interest were severe complications requiring revisional surgery. Follow-up ranged from 7 to 15 years. Results Of 892 OAGB procedures performed during the study period, 97 patients (10.9%) underwent OAGB with a 250-cm BPL. Complete follow-up data were available for 78 patients (80.4%). Mean age was 47 years, mean preoperative BMI was 46.6 kg/m 2 , and 75.3% were female. Nineteen patients (24.3%) developed severe complications requiring revisional surgery. Indications included severe protein malnutrition (5.1%), refractory bile or acid reflux (6.4%), severe diarrhoea (6.4%), liver failure (2.5%), twisted gastrojejunostomy (2.5%), and excessive weight loss (1.3%). Revisions included conversion to sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or reversal to normal anatomy. Conclusion OAGB with a fixed biliopancreatic limb length of 250 cm was associated with a high rate of severe long-term complications requiring revisional surgery. These findings support cautious tailoring of BPL length and avoidance of routinely long limbs in OAGB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussain et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: