Key result
Use of the online JBS3-derived heart age tool revealed that estimated heart age was higher than chronological age for 79% of all users and 69% of users under 40 years.
Observational (n=575,782)
An online heart age tool reached a large population, including younger individuals at high cardiovascular risk, highlighting public interest in self-assessment despite low awareness of specific risk factors like blood pressure and cholesterol.
Broadens reach of personalized cardiovascular risk tools; leaves open effects on NHS Health Check uptake.
OBJECTIVE: A modified version of the Joint British Societies (JBS3) 'heart age' tool was introduced online to broaden access to personalised risk assessment to the general population and encourage participation in the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check programme. This study reports on its early uptake and the profiles of those who used the self-assessment tool to determine their own cardiovascular risk. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective analysis of online tool use. SETTING: Between February and July 2015, user data collected from the NHS Choices website, where the tool was hosted, were analysed anonymously using standard analytic packages. RESULTS: The online tool landing page was viewed 1.4 million times in the first 5 months, with increased activity following limited media coverage. Of the 575 782 users completing the data journey with a valid 'heart age' result, their demographic and risk factor profiles broadly resembled the population of England, although both younger users and males (60%) were over-represented. Almost 50% and 79% did not know or enter their blood pressure or total cholesterol values, respectively. Estimated heart age was higher than chronological age for 79% of all users, and also for 69% of younger users under 40 years who are at low 10-year risk and not invited for NHS Health Checks. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a high level of public interest in self-assessment of cardiovascular risk when an easily understood metric is used, although a large number of users lack awareness of their own risk factors. The heart age tool was accessed by a group not easily reached by conventional approaches yet is at high cardiovascular risk and would benefit most from early and sustained risk reduction. These are both important opportunities for interventions to educate and empower the public to manage better their cardiovascular risk and promote population-level prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk (n=575,782). JBS3-derived heart age tool was evaluated on Estimated heart age higher than chronological age. Use of the online JBS3-derived heart age tool revealed that estimated heart age was higher than chronological age for 79% of all users and 69% of users under 40 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: