Why the study?
Cardiovascular risk assessment is mostly performed by physicians, but mHealth apps could decouple risk determination from medical resources by enabling unrestricted, layperson-interpretable self-assessment.
A guideline-based cardiovascular risk calculator integrated into an mHealth app showed high public demand, achieving over 96,000 downloads in 14 months.
Supports clinician endorsement of mHealth risk tools for engagement; extends real-world adoption data for guideline-based digital prevention.
BACKGROUND: Identifying high-risk individuals is crucial for preventing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Currently, risk assessment is mostly performed by physicians. Mobile health apps could help decouple the determination of risk from medical resources by allowing unrestricted self-assessment. The respective test results need to be interpretable for laypersons. OBJECTIVE: Together with a patient organization, we aimed to design a digital risk calculator that allows people to individually assess and optimize their CVD risk. The risk calculator was integrated into the mobile health app HerzFit, which provides the respective background information. METHODS: To cover a broad spectrum of individuals for both primary and secondary prevention, we integrated the respective scores (Framingham 10-year CVD, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 in Older Persons, and Secondary Manifestations Of Arterial Disease) into a single risk calculator that was recalibrated for the German population. In primary prevention, an individual's heart age is estimated, which gives the user an easy-to-understand metric for assessing cardiac health. For secondary prevention, the risk of recurrence was assessed. In addition, a comparison of expected to mean and optimal risk levels was determined. The risk calculator is available free of charge. Data safety is ensured by processing the data locally on the users' smartphones. RESULTS: Offering a risk calculator to the general population requires the use of multiple instruments, as each provides only a limited spectrum in terms of age and risk distribution. The integration of 4 internationally recommended scores allows risk calculation in individuals aged 30 to 90 years with and without CVD. Such integration requires recalibration and harmonization to provide consistent and plausible estimates. In the first 14 months after the launch, the HerzFit calculator was downloaded more than 96,000 times, indicating great demand. Public information campaigns proved effective in publicizing the risk calculator and contributed significantly to download numbers. CONCLUSIONS: The HerzFit calculator provides CVD risk assessment for the general population. The public demonstrated great demand for such a risk calculator as it was downloaded up to 10,000 times per month, depending on campaigns creating awareness for the instrument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Starnecker et al. (2023) studied Cardiovascular disease risk (n=96,000). HerzFit mHealth app was evaluated on App downloads. The HerzFit cardiovascular risk calculator app was downloaded over 96,000 times in its first 14 months, demonstrating high public demand for digital self-assessment tools.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: