Key result
Web-based tool completes initial CV risk assessment in ~13 minutes.
Why the study?
Does a web-based cardiovascular risk assessment tool improve the identification of risk factors in general practice patients?
Does a web-based cardiovascular risk assessment tool improve the identification of risk factors in general practice patients?
A web-based tool for comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment is feasible in clinical practice and helps identify patients with multiple risk factors outside guideline targets.
Supports feasibility of web-based cardiovascular risk assessment in primary care; leaves open impact on management and outcomes.
Background: Multifactor cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death; besides well-known cardiovascular risk factors, several emerging factors such as mental stress, diet type, and physical inactivity, have been associated to cardiovascular disease. To date, preventive strategies are based on the concept of absolute risk calculated by different algorithms and scoring systems. However, in general practice the patient's data collection represents a critical issue. Design: A new multipurpose computer-based program has been developed in order to:1) easily calculate and compare the absolute cardiovascular risk by the Framingham, Procam, and Progetto Cuore algorithms; 2) to design a web-based computerized tool for prospective collection of structured data; 3) to support the doctor in the decision-making process for patients at risk according to recent international guidelines. Methods: During a medical consultation the doctor utilizes a common computer connected by Internet to a medical server where all the patient's data and software reside. The program evaluates absolute and relative cardiovascular risk factors, personalized patient's goals, and multiparametric trends, monitors critical parameter values, and generates an automated medical report. Results: In a pilot study on 294 patients (47% males; mean age 60 ± 12 years [± SD]) the global time to collect data at first consultation was 13 ± 11 minutes which declined to 8 ± 7 minutes at the subsequent consultation. In 48.2% of cases the program revealed 2 or more primary risk factor parameters outside guideline indications and gave specific clinical suggestions to return altered parameters to target values. Conclusion: The web-based system proposed here may represent a feasible and flexible tool for clinical management of patients at risk of cardiovascular disease and for epidemiological research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iervasi et al. (2011) studied Cardiovascular risk (n=294). Web-based cardiovascular risk assessment tool (VIRC) was evaluated on Time to collect data at first consultation (minutes). The web-based tool was feasible, requiring 13 ± 11 minutes for initial data collection, and identified 2 or more primary risk factors outside guideline targets in 48.2% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: