Key result
Novel long-T ITC complex adds no prognostic value for 1-year MACE over established hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the novel long-T ITC complex could assist in clinical prognostic utility compared to established cardiac biomarkers in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes.
Does the novel long-T ITC complex improve prognostic assessment for MACE and all-cause mortality compared to hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes?
Cohort (n=1,070)
Does the novel long-T ITC complex improve prognostic assessment for MACE and all-cause mortality compared to hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.001 (95% CI 1–1.001)
The novel long-T ITC complex does not provide additional prognostic value over established hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT assays for predicting 1-year MACE and all-cause mortality in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes.
Long-T ITC complex adds no prognostic value over hs-cTnI; leaves open any incremental role in ischemia risk stratification.
Objectives Understanding whether the novel long-T ITC complex might assist in interpreting clinical prognostic utility compared to established cardiac biomarkers is needed. We determined long term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality (ACM) predicated on novel long-T ITC complex and high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and T (hs-cTnT) assays in the emergency department (ED). Methods cTn assays were measured on the Mindray CL-1200i platform at presentation in consecutive patients enrolled in ‘Mindray hs-cTnI Assay Analytical and Clinical Evaluation for the Diagnosis and RIsk Assessment of Myocardial InfarctIon’ (MERITnI) (NCT05853042) trial with suspected ischemia. Sex specific 99th percentiles upper reference limits (URLs) were: hs-cTnI female 14 ng/L, male 15 ng/L; hs-cTnT female 10 ng/L, male 19 ng/L; long-T ITC complex 0.9 ng/L, same for female and male. Results Of 1,070 patients, 59.4 % were male, 43.4 % White, 45.5 % Black, and 39.5 % ≥65 years. Independent of biomarkers, a continuum of risk over 1 year showed MACE increased to 16.1 % and ACM to 16.5 %. Long-T ITC complex did not show a continuum change, increasing only 0.1 % (HR: 1.001 (1.0–1.001) per ng/L. However, hs-cTnI increased 1.8 % (HR: 1.018 [1.009–1.027] for each ng/L (p<0.0001) and hs-cTnT increased 0.3 % per ng/L (HR: 1.003 [1.001–1.006]) (p=0.0028). Between subjects ≤URLs and >URLs, MACE and ACM all biomarkers showed significant (p<0.0001) differences over 1 year. For MACE in those >URL long-T ITC complex increased 11.2–25.2 %, hs-cTnI 18.0–35.0 % and hs-cTnT 8.9–24.2 %. For ACM in those >URL long-T ITC complex increased 4.5–23.3 %, hs-cTnI 5.0–26.2 %, and hs-cTnT 3.6–24.1 %. Conclusions Novel long-T ITC complex did not provide new prognostic value to either hs-cTnI or hs-cTnT. Patients with increased hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT concentrations had marked increases in MACE and ACM risk at 1-year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apple et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected acute coronary syndromes (n=1,070). Novel long-T ITC complex vs. hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (HR 1.001, 95% CI 1.0-1.001). The novel long-T ITC complex did not provide new prognostic value for 1-year MACE (HR 1.001; 95% CI 1.0-1.001 per ng/L) compared to established hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT assays.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: