Randomized trial analyzes survival outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, indicating improved real-world treatment effectiveness.
We analysed 1384 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients from 10 representative centres of the Chinese Myeloma Committee to provide an important modern real-world reference. Survival outcomes were verified by the National Mortality Surveillance System to ensure data accuracy. The median age was 62 years, confirming a younger age at onset in Chinese patients than in Western populations. Treatment patterns have evolved significantly: Lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVD) became the predominant induction regimen (51.8%), and upfront autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) rates in patients aged ≤65 years rose to 40.0% (vs. 20.0% in our previous multicentre study). In a subcohort of patients from two out of the 10 sites, the median progression-free survival was 44.2 months. In the overall multicentre cohort, the median survival was not reached during a median follow-up of 46.6 months, with an estimated 4-year survival rate of 66.4%. Using the 2025 International Myeloma Society (IMS) / International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS), 26.2% of patients were classified as high risk. Patients harbouring ≥2 CGS high-risk factors (3.8%) had significantly inferior prognosis. This study validates the 2025 CGS in an Asian cohort and suggests that the widespread adoption of modern triplets is associated with improved real-world survival, while highlighting the distinct poor outcomes in patients with multiple CGS risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: