Investigates mobility challenges among low-income groups, highlighting imbalances in access to sustainable transport.
This paper investigates the intersection of mobility justice and sustainability transitions, focusing on how low-income groups experience and navigate mobility challenges. Data was gathered through storytelling workshops (14) and individual interviews (22), involving a total of 73 participants from low-income groups in three Norwegian cities: Bergen, Stavanger, and Trondheim. Using the concept of motility to reframe mobility as a form of social capital, our analysis shows how these groups are unable to appropriate any of the benefits offered by transitions towards low-carbon mobility, and instead face barriers like limited access to new technology, subsidies, and public infrastructure, at the same time as they are not being rewarded for their low-emission travel modes. Accordingly, the paper highlights a tension within Norway’s sustainability transitions strategy, showing how progress in technology diffusion, such as electric vehicle adoption, has resulted in an uneven distribution of benefits and a marginalisation of alternative low-carbon mobility. We argue for a shift in transport policy toward equity-focused measures, including targeted support for mature and low-cost technologies like e-bikes, improving the affordability and everyday flexibility of public transport, and establishing more inclusive planning processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Næss et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: