Demonstrates enhanced underwater image quality using a semantic guidance network, suggesting improved perception.
Underwater images often suffer from color distortion, low contrast, and structural blurring caused by wavelength-dependent absorption and scattering, which degrade both visual observation and downstream perception. Existing underwater image enhancement methods usually learn image-level restoration mappings, while the relationships among semantic regions, degradation patterns, and restoration responses are not fully exploited. In this paper, we propose a Semantic Guidance Network with Degradation Consistency for Underwater Image Enhancement (SGDC-UIE). Specifically, SGDC-UIE first extracts dense semantic responses from a frozen DINOv3 prior and converts them into foreground, boundary, and background region gates. These gates are then used to guide pseudo-physical degradation estimation, producing attenuation-like, transmission-like, illumination, structure, and background-light priors for region-aware restoration. These pseudo-physical priors are learned, bounded conditioning variables rather than calibrated estimates of underwater optical parameters. Based on these degradation conditions, a dual-branch restoration network corrects low-frequency color and illumination degradation while recovering high-frequency structural details through semantic-aware wavelet restoration. The color-restored and structure-restored outputs are further integrated by a degradation-consistent fusion gate, which adaptively balances visual fidelity and task-relevant structure preservation. In addition, grouped supervision with quality-anchor replay stabilizes task-aware fine-tuning and reduces visual-quality drift. Extensive experiments on paired and no-reference underwater enhancement benchmarks, semantic segmentation, and underwater object detection show that SGDC-UIE achieves competitive restoration quality and improves the usability of enhanced images for downstream perception.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ming et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: