What question did this study set out to answer?

This research explores alternative development frameworks for the Asia-Pacific region following the end of USAID operations.

Beyond the hegemonic horizon: A third path for Asia–Pacific nations in the post-USAID era

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

This article argues for a new development framework in the Asia-Pacific, emphasizing equity and local cooperation amidst geopolitical shifts.

This research explores alternative development frameworks for the Asia-Pacific region following the end of USAID operations.
Analyzes the implications of USAID's dissolution on development aid in Asia and the Pacific.
Evaluates existing models from Australia, Canada, and the European Union.
Proposes a new approach based on multi-lateral solidarity and locally led cooperation.
Identifies a viable third path for development that contrasts with Sino-Russian influences.
Highlights the importance of equitable partnerships in fostering resilience in local communities.
Suggests that geopolitical dynamics should not dictate developmental goals or ethics.

Robert Huish (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This article argues for a new development framework in the Asia-Pacific, emphasizing equity and local cooperation amidst geopolitical shifts.