Examines factor structure and predicts outcomes in STEM students, suggesting evaluation improvements for support needs.
The purpose of this study was to find the best-fitting factor structure of the Students Support Needs Scale-Augmented (SSNS-A), and to examine its relations to other key outcomes among Historically Black University STEM students. Participants included 384 STEM students (85% African American) at an HBCU. The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) scales were collected, along with measures of math anxiety and class attendance. Multiple confirmatory factor analysis models were fit. A path analysis was used to predict student outcomes from the SSNS-A scales. The best-fitting factor structure was a modified bifactor model, with correlated residuals between two similar latent factors: Feedback-Procedural Expectations (Feedback-PE) and Feedback-Rewards, Recognition, and Incentives (Feedback-RRI). The general student support (GSS) factor and most SSNS-A scales predicted various outcomes. The Feedback-PE and Feedback-RRI did not predict any of the outcomes. Implications for how the SSNS-A GSS and scales can be used to evaluate students’ needs are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gross et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: