Compares color adjustment and fluorescence matching in nine composite resin types, suggesting performance variances.
Background: Although the color adjustment of single-shade composites has been widely investigated, limited information is available regarding their fluorescence-matching performance. The aim of this study was to compare the optical performance of different composite resin systems by evaluating color adjustment under visible-light conditions and fluorescence matching under ultraviolet (UV) illumination. Methods: Standardized cervical cavities were prepared in 45 extracted human maxillary central incisors. Teeth were divided into nine groups (n = 5): five single-shade composites (Omnichroma, Charisma Topaz One, Vittra APS Unique, Zenchroma, and ONEshade), two simplified shade composites (Optishade and Clearfil Majesty ES-2), one multi-shade composite (Estelite Sigma Quick), and one group-shade composite (G-aenial A’chord). Color adjustment was evaluated using spectrophotometry (SP) and cross-polarized digital photography (CP), whereas fluorescence matching was evaluated using fluorescence-illuminated digital photography (FI). Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: FI showed significantly higher ΔE values (23.01 ± 7.04) than SP (3.34 ± 1.52) and CP (3.55 ± 1.35) (p < 0.001). G-aenial A’chord exhibited the lowest ΔE values (6.54 ± 5.01), whereas Charisma Topaz One showed the highest fluorescence mismatch (30.22 ± 10.92) (p < 0.001). A significant interaction was found between composite type and measurement method (p < 0.001). Conclusions: While single-shade composites exhibited favorable color adjustment under visible-light conditions, they showed greater fluorescence mismatch under UV illumination. In contrast, the group-shade composite demonstrated the most stable optical performance across different evaluation methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karalar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: