Psychological Distress and Self-Care Among Brazilian Psychologists During Brazil’s COVID-19 Mortality Peak and Three Years Later: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Brazilian psychologists faced heightened occupational and emotional demands during the COVID-19 peak, yet evidence on longer-term changes in distress and self-care is limited. This repeated cross-sectional study compared psychological distress and multidimensional self-care among Brazilian psychologists at the pandemic peak (T1: April 2021; n = 578) and three years later (T2: April 2024; n = 524). Methods: Distress (DASS-21) and self-care indicators (perceived self-care, working hours, work–life balance, psychotherapy/psychiatric care) were assessed. Blockwise OLS and logistic models (M0–M3) estimated time differences; dose–response and moderation analyses used adjusted marginal means with FDR correction. Results: Anxiety and stress were lower at T2 (M3: anxiety β = −1.53; stress β = −2.08; p < 0.001), whereas depression showed no statistically significant change in fully adjusted models (β = −0.37, p = 0.456), with only a modest downward tendency evident in unadjusted and nonparametric comparisons. Clinically elevated (Moderate+) anxiety decreased robustly (OR = 0.56), while the reduction in Moderate+stress was attenuated after full adjustment (OR = 0.71, p = 0.049) and did not remain significant after FDR correction. Perceived self-care showed a dose–response association with lower distress, and stress declined most among telehealth and hybrid practitioners. Conclusions: Three years post-peak, anxiety and stress were lower, whereas depression showed no clear change in fully adjusted models, indicating heterogeneous recovery. Self-care and work conditions were key associated factors, underscoring the need for sustained workforce well-being strategies. Because the design was repeated cross-sectional, these findings reflect sample-level trends rather than within-person change.