Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced fault detection in the Tennessee Eastman Process, highlighting better alarm control.
Fault detection in the Tennessee Eastman Process (TEP) is challenged by transient dynamics, post-injection regime transitions, and score drift that destabilize fixed-threshold detectors and increase false alarms. In the proposed Risk-Budgeted Conformal Anomaly Detection (RBC-AD) framework, a calibration-based anomaly detector integrates a causal forecasting backbone, frequency-aware scoring, and conformal decisioning. The forecaster is a dilated temporal convolutional network with causal self-attention, trained on fault-free runs to predict one-step-ahead Gaussian parameters by minimizing negative log-likelihood. Detection then scores each window using a fused nonconformity measure that combines the window-averaged predictive log-likelihood with an FFT-based frequency deviation term, using robust normalization fitted on a held-out calibration split and tuning the fusion weight under leakage-controlled splits. Conformal quantiles at miscoverage level α=0.05 define normal, uncertain, and anomaly states with finite-sample correction. Run-level partitioning over 500 runs per split and post-injection sampling (3,000 normal windows, 8,000 fault windows) achieves ROC-AUC = 1.000 and PR-AUC = 1.000 under the post-injection-only protocol; full-stream results provide the deployment-relevant assessment. Static conformal thresholds (θu=0.1977, θa=0.3033) yield F1 = 0.9989 and F1 = 0.9999. Deployment selects an uncertainty threshold to satisfy an empirical normal alarm-rate target of 0.05. Full-stream evaluation reports uncertainty rate and detection delay under k-consecutive alarm logic, with optional drift-triggered recalibration using normal-stream scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mudasir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: