Key result
Long-term follow-up after PCI for unprotected left main trunk disease demonstrated significant lesion regression, with minimal lumen diameter increasing from 2.46 mm to 2.72 mm (p < 0.0001).
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve long-term angiographic outcomes in unprotected left main trunk disease?
Observational (n=225)
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve long-term angiographic outcomes in unprotected left main trunk disease?
p-value: p=< 0.0001
PCI for unprotected left main trunk disease is associated with significant long-term angiographic lesion regression, supporting its durability.
Long-term PCI for ULMTD shows lesion regression without new restenosis; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of durability.
BACKGROUND: Although some studies have documented the six-month angiographic outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new devices for unprotected left main trunk disease (ULMTD), a long-term angiographic analysis is mandatory to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this procedure. This study aims to assess a long-term (one year or more) angiographic analysis after PCI for this lesion. METHODS: PCI was performed for 225 ULMTD with de novo or restenotic lesions. There were 19 deaths and 12 repeat PCIs during the hospital stay. The remaining 194 lesions were followed, and 126 lesions showed no angiographic restenosis or target lesion revascularization within six months. Finally, long-term quantitative angiographic follow-up was completed in 78 lesions (mean 2.4 years, maximum 7.5 years after PCI). RESULTS: Minimal lumen diameter increased significantly from 2.46 ± 0.59 mm to 2.72 ± 0.65 mm (p < 0.0001) and percent diameter stenosis decreased significantly from 26 ± 14% to 19 ± 14% (p < 0.0001) between the six-month and the long-term follow-ups. No additional restenosis or new lesions were found at long-term follow-up, and significant lesion regression was ascertained in each procedure (directional coronary atherectomy, p < 0.005; ballooning, p < 0.005; stenting, p < 0.05).</emph> CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the safety and effectiveness of PCI for ULMTD during the long-term period. (Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2003; 5: 132-136)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosuga et al. (2003) conducted an observational in unprotected left main trunk disease (n=225). percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was evaluated on Minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis between six-month and long-term follow-up (p=< 0.0001). Long-term follow-up after PCI for unprotected left main trunk disease demonstrated significant lesion regression, with minimal lumen diameter increasing from 2.46 mm to 2.72 mm (p < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: