Key result
3D transoesophageal echocardiography dramatically reduced the time to diagnosis compared to 2D methods across all reader experience levels (P < 0.001) and provided the highest diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
Does 3D-TOE improve diagnostic accuracy and time to diagnosis for mitral valve prolapse compared to 2D-TTE and 2D-TOE across readers with different experience levels?
Observational (n=25)
Single-blind
No
Does 3D-TOE improve diagnostic accuracy and time to diagnosis for mitral valve prolapse compared to 2D-TTE and 2D-TOE across readers with different experience levels?
3D-TOE improves diagnostic accuracy, specificity, and speed of diagnosing mitral valve prolapse compared to 2D methods, particularly aiding less experienced readers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May shorten time to P2 prolapse diagnosis across readers; leaves open need for outcome trials before routine adoption.
Contradiction exists on the incremental value of two-dimensional (2D) and 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) over 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for the detection of mitral valve (MV) prolapse in readers with different echocardiographic experience. Twenty patients and five healthy persons were retrospectively identified who had undergone 2D-TTE, 2D-TOE and 3D-TOE. Fifteen (75 %) patients had surgical evidence of prolapse of the posterior MV leaflet and five patients (25 %) had a dilated MV annulus without prolapse. Three reader groups with different echocardiographic expertise (novice, trainees, cardiologists) scored thus in total 675 posterior scallops. Overall there was an improvement in agreement and Kappa values from novice to trainees to cardiologists. Diagnostic accuracies of 2D-TOE were higher than those of 2D-TTE mainly in novice readers. The incremental value of 3D-TOE over 2D-TOE was mainly seen in specificities. Time to diagnosis was dramatically reduced from 2D to 3D-TEE in all reader groups (all P < 0.001). 3D-TOE also improved the agreement (+12 to +16 %) and Kappa values (+0.14 to +0.21) in all reader groups for the exact description of P2 prolapse. Differences between readers with variable experience in determining the precise localization and extent of the prolapsing posterior MV scallops exist in particular in 2D-TTE analysis. 3D-TOE analysis was extremely fast compared to the 2D analysis methods and showed the best diagnostic accuracy (mainly driven by specificity) with identification of P1 and P3 prolapse still improving from novice to trainees to cardiologists and provided optimal description of P2 prolapse extent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laat et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Mitral valve prolapse (n=25). 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TOE) vs. 2D-TTE and 2D-TOE was evaluated on Time to diagnosis (p=<0.001). 3D transoesophageal echocardiography dramatically reduced the time to diagnosis compared to 2D methods across all reader experience levels (P < 0.001) and provided the highest diagnostic accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: