Key result
Coronary artery ectasia was present in 5% of patients undergoing coronary arteriography, predominantly affecting males (96%) and most often involving the right coronary artery (96%).
Observational (n=431)
Coronary artery ectasia is present in approximately 5% of patients undergoing angiography and requires careful interpretation to avoid misdiagnosing narrow segments between dilated areas as true obstructions requiring bypass.
May necessitate careful angiographic review to avoid misdiagnosis; leaves open optimal management strategies.
Of 431 consecutive patients who underwent coronary arteriography during the twelve month period ending December 1976, 23 (5%) had angiographically documented coronary artery ectasia. Of these only five had "pure" or isolated ectasia, whilst 18 had ectatic disease combined with coronary artery stenoses. Clinical findings that are significantly associated with ectasia are male predominance (96%), abnormal lipid patterns (64%), a positive family history of coronary artery disease (57%) and previous hypertension (50%). Anatomically, ectasia most often involved the right coronary artery (96%), then the circumflex artery (75%) and the left anterior descending artery (57%). Only seven (five with severe proximal stenoses) of the 28 patients had coronary artery bypass grafts. Care should be taken not to overdiagnose narrow segments between ectatic, dilated segments as being obstructions. Failure to appreciate this resulted in two patients with isolated coronary artery ectasia having bypass grafts performed with little relief of their symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baron et al. (1979) conducted an observational in Coronary artery ectasia (n=431). Coronary artery ectasia was evaluated on Prevalence of angiographically documented coronary artery ectasia. Coronary artery ectasia was present in 5% of patients undergoing coronary arteriography, predominantly affecting males (96%) and most often involving the right coronary artery (96%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: