Evaluates MnO2 nonmetal doping effects on NH3-SCR performance, highlighting implications for environmental regulations.
Low‐temperature ammonia‐selective catalytic reduction (NH 3 ‐SCR) over MnO 2 is attractive for nitrogen oxides (NO x ) abatement yet is intrinsically penalized by nitrous oxide (N 2 O) formation, a potent greenhouse byproduct. Here, we show that oxygen‐site nonmetal substitution in β ‐MnO 2 can simultaneously suppress N 2 O and accelerate NH 3 ‐selective SCR, enabled by a feasibility‐to‐mechanism computational workflow. Screening by structural compatibility, orbital hybridization, thermochemical and kinetic stability identifies viable dopants, among which F and S most effectively rewire reaction branching. Kinetics estimated by the density functional theory calculations reveal that F and S raise the N 2 O‐forming rate‐determining barrier from 0.80 eV to 0.93/0.92 eV, while lowering the N 2 ‐forming barrier from 0.48 eV to 0.40/0.42 eV. At 200°C, F‐ and S‐doped β ‐MnO 2 increase TOF by a factor of 8.40 and 4.24, respectively, and enhance kinetic N 2 selectivity by a factor of 1.66 and 1.38, respectively. We identify Mn( d )–nonmetal( p ) band center alignment as a mechanistic descriptor that points to a volcano‐like trend for the energy barriers of N 2 O and N 2 , supported by Bader charge, COHP/ICOHP, and ELF analyses. These results serve as a theoretical design reference for tuning the activity–selectivity trade‐off in oxygen‐site–modified oxide SCR catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: