Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proof-of-concept case study examining thermal signatures to diagnose induction motor faults, suggesting improved diagnostics methods.
Infrared thermography enables non-contact monitoring of induction motor thermal behavior, but absolute temperature alone may not distinguish faults with similar surface heating. This paper presents a proof-of-concept case study on the explainable thermographic diagnosis of three-phase induction motors using transient thermal signatures. Two faults were imposed on the same Siemens 1LA2080-4AA10 squirrel-cage motor: loss of forced ventilation (hereafter, cooling failure) and a resistive-bank-induced phase unbalance condition denoted in the test bench as 50% phase unbalance. The approach combines motor-specific regions of interest, transient thermal descriptors, hot area expansion, first-order thermal modeling, healthy baseline residuals, and two physically motivated indices: the Cooling Failure Index (CFI) and Phase Unbalance Thermal Index (PUTI). Cooling failure was analyzed from radiometric CSV data, whereas phase unbalance was evaluated from color-mapped thermal video through scale-based temperature reconstruction and is therefore interpreted as an estimated thermal signature. For the baseline self-reference consistency check, the residual-based fault flag remained false. Cooling failure increased the maximum radiometric temperature from 77.2 °C to 91.6 °C, with 43,399 pixels above 80 °C. Phase unbalance showed a localized stator-dominated rise without hot area expansion above 80 °C in the reconstructed sequence. The rule-based layer assigned high CFI to cooling failure and high PUTI to phase unbalance, supporting explainable case-study-based discrimination while avoiding claims of general classifier validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: