Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study estimates dynamic networks in psychological research, indicating a unified approach for network analysis.
Networks are often estimated from data such as psychometric scales, event data, and ecological momentary assessment data. We introduce the Nestimate R package, which offers a unified interface for estimating networks through a standardized workflow. First, Nestimate estimates psychological network models using correlation, partial-correlation, regularized (graphical lasso), Ising, and mixed graphical networks from both frequency and event data. Second, Nestimate introduces multi-cluster networks, which aggregate psychometric networks using, for example, factor loadings, principal components, or network connectivity. Third, higher-order network models represent dynamics whose probability depends on more than the immediately preceding state and offer a rich interface for measuring and evaluating higher-order behaviors such as critical thinking. Fourth, Nestimate provides functions for estimating dynamic networks, including transition, co-occurrence, and mixed networks, for capturing behavioral dynamics from event data. Every estimated network can be subjected to a unified validation pipeline, including non-parametric bootstrapping, permutation testing, split-half reliability, and case-dropping centrality stability analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saqr et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: