Evaluates improved reproducibility of coating thickness measurements in industrial settings, suggesting enhanced quality control methods.
The accurate determination of the thickness of the metallic coating on steel substrates is essential in industrial quality control. Eddy current testing offers a non-destructive solution by evaluating the impedance or mutual impedance of one or multiple coils. Analytical models exist in the literature for selected sensor configurations. Building on these models, a model-based estimation approach can be applied to derive an estimate for coating thickness and other relevant material and geometry parameters. Conventional setups typically employ wire-wound coils. However, manufacturing tolerances introduce discrepancies between nominal and actual coil geometries, which lead to deviations in the coating thickness estimate. A printed circuit board (PCB)-based coil with lithographically defined geometry achieves substantially tighter fabrication tolerances and higher repeatability than wire-wound coils. In this work, an analytical mutual impedance model for a differential multi-layer PCB pancake coil is derived and validated against established models in the literature with respect to forward modeling accuracy and model-based parameter estimation performance. Furthermore, experimental measurements with two-layer and eight-layer PCB differential coil systems produce parameter estimates with significantly better reproducibility than wire-wound coils. The experimental results show that the two-layer PCB coil achieves close agreement between the absolute estimated parameters and the reference values without requiring additional calibration, while maintaining high sensitivity to coating thickness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koll et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: