Prospective comparative study evaluates IOP dynamics of aflibercept 8 mg and 2 mg, suggesting monitoring for glaucoma patients.
Purpose The increased injection volume of aflibercept 8 mg (0.07 ml versus 0.05 ml) raises theoretical concerns regarding intraocular pressure (IOP) effects. This study evaluated acute IOP dynamics following aflibercept 8 mg compared to aflibercept 2 mg and identified predictive factors for pressure elevation. Methods 140 eyes of 127 patients receiving aflibercept 8 mg (70 eyes) or 2 mg (70 eyes) between January-December 2025 were included. IOP was measured at baseline (T0), immediately post-injection (T1), and 30 min post-injection (T2). Linear mixed-effects models assessed the effects of time, treatment group, and time-by-treatment interactions. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was used to identify predictors of IOP >21mmHg and IOP elevation >5mmHg at T2. Results Both formulations produced significant IOP elevations from baseline at T1 and T2 ( p < 0.001 within each group). Mean IOP increased from 14.0 mmHg to 39.3 mmHg (aflibercept 2 mg) and 14.5 mmHg to 39.3 mmHg (aflibercept 8 mg) immediately post-injection, with near-complete resolution by 30 min (16.9 vs 17.7 mmHg). No significant between-group differences were identified at any timepoint. Pre-existing glaucoma/OHT was the only consistent independent predictor of both IOP >21 mmHg (OR 3.00–3.31, p = 0.024–0.038) and IOP elevation >5 mmHg from baseline (OR 10.45–11.75, p < 0.001) at T2; aflibercept formulation was not associated with either outcome. No injection required paracentesis. Conclusion Aflibercept 8 mg demonstrates comparable IOP dynamics to aflibercept 2 mg. Glaucoma/OHT represents the strongest predictor of early pressure elevation, warranting enhanced monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janmohamed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: