Retrospective study identifies risk factors influencing outcomes in patients with perforated peptic ulcer, suggesting improvements in care.
Objective. To identify predictive factors of morbidity and mortality following perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). Material and methods. A retrospective study included patients with PPU who underwent surgery between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2021. Results. A total of 129 patients were included. There were 114 men (88.4%) and 15 women (11.6%) with M/F ratio 7.6 and mean age 44.8 years (range 17—89). All patients underwent urgent surgical treatment. Laparoscopic approach was carried out in 90.7% of cases, median laparotomy — in 9.3% of cases. Intraoperative exploration revealed peritonitis in 123 cases. Perforation was located in anterior aspect of the duodenal bulb in 95.3% of patients and on the upper edge of the duodenal bulb in 4.7% of cases. Perforation suturing, peritoneal lavage and abdominal drainage were performed in all patients. Mean surgery time was 93 min. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in 6.2% of patients. Time to conversion ranged from 50 to 120 min. The overall morbidity rate was 7.8%, overall mortality rate — 7.8%. In multivariate analysis, morbidity and mortality risk factors were age >45 years, female gender, smoking, comorbidities, shock on admission, delay of surgery >6 hours, creatinine >106 μmol/L, degree of peritoneal contamination and perforation size. Conclusion. Analysis of predictive factors of morbidity and mortality in PPU is crucial to improve patient outcomes and guide clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alioua et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: