Perspective examines how Global North early-career researchers can combat epistemic injustices in Global Health, suggesting practical approaches for improvement.
This perspective examines the role of Global North early-career researchers (GN-ECRs) in addressing epistemic injustices within Global Health. Despite growing efforts to decolonize Global Health, epistemic injustices continue to undermine the field. We argue that GN-ECRs need to critically engage with our roles to reduce epistemic injustices in Global Health. While we benefit from access to resources and platforms within the Global Health system, our authority within Global North academic hierarchies remains limited. Referring to the stages of awareness, deliberation and action, we outline how GN-ECRs must balance their roles at the intersection of privilege and constraint, and take responsibility for identifying feasible leverage points within existing structures. While the pursuit of equity and inclusivity is challenging and imperfect, each actor, including GN-ECRs, has a responsibility to contribute to a more just, inclusive and impactful system. By framing epistemic injustice through a consequentialist-positionality lens, this perspective offers a practical methodological tool for more equitable and effective Global Health research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lubbers et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: