Investigates emotional reactions to daily events in women with borderline personality disorder, suggesting improved understanding of mood dynamics.
Ambulatory assessment (AA) research often relies on closed-ended context checklists, whereas open-ended event descriptions preserve richer idiographic context but are rarely analyzed at scale. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by marked instability, providing a clinically informative use case for testing scalable approaches to contextual dynamics in daily life. We investigated the association of event context and sentiment (i.e., emotional connotation) derived using a large language model (LLM) with self-reported momentary calmness, affective valence, and self-esteem in a sample of 265 women (131 individuals with BPD and 134 healthy controls) undergoing a 4-day high-frequency AA with 12 hourly assessments per day. We evaluated an automated LLM pipeline for classifying 10,844 free-text entries and for rating event-related sentiment, enabling quantitative modeling of context and appraisal in AA. The free-text entries were classified into five categories: daily routines and household, leisure and recreation, social and personal relationships, work and professional engagements, health and well-being, plus an indeterminate category. Results showed the BPD group had lower values across outcomes and reacted with significantly lower calmness and self-esteem during social/personal events, as well as significantly lower self-esteem during health- and well-being-related activities, compared with controls. When sentiment was modeled alongside event categories, more positive-than-usual sentiments were associated with higher calmness, valence, and self-esteem, whereas more negative-than-usual sentiments were associated with lower states, with larger sentiment reactivity in BPD for calmness, valence and self-esteem. By employing LLMs for automated text categorization and sentiment analysis of free-text entries within AA research, we have effectively incorporated contextual information into our analysis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tekampe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: