Key result
Higher estimated fitness is linked to ~22% lower cardiometabolic multimorbidity risk per 1-MET increment.
Why the study?
The association between estimated cardiorespiratory fitness and incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity, as well as its contribution to risk prediction in older adults, was not established.
Does higher estimated cardiorespiratory fitness reduce incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity in older adults?
Cohort (n=3,326)
Does higher estimated cardiorespiratory fitness reduce incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity in older adults?
Odds Ratio: 0.78 (95% CI 0.7–0.87)
Estimated cardiorespiratory fitness derived from simple clinical variables is a practical marker for identifying older adults at elevated risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity.
May aid CMM risk stratification via eCRF in older adults; extends observational data but leaves causality and intervention effects open.
Objective To evaluate the association of estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) with incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) and its potential contribution to CMM risk prediction in an older adult population. Patients and Methods The analysis included 3326 participants from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (mean age 63 years; 1820 (54.7%) women) who were free of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and stroke at baseline (wave 4; 2008-2009). Estimated CRF was derived using validated nonexercise prediction equations (heart rate-based, body mass index-based, and Nord-Trøndelag Health Study-based eCRF). Incident CMM was defined at wave 10 (2021-2023) as the presence of ≥2 of the following: hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or stroke. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% CIs) and discrimination indices were calculated. Results During 12-15 years of follow-up, 197 (5.9%) participants developed CMM. Each eCRF measure reported an inverse linear association with CMM risk. Higher heart rate-based eCRF was associated with lower odds of CMM (per 1- metabolic equivalents (MET) increment: OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87; highest vs lowest tertile: OR=0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.69). Similar associations were observed for body mass index-based eCRF (per 1-MET increment: OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.89; highest vs lowest tertile: OR=0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.70) and Nord-Trøndelag Health Study-based eCRF (per 1-MET increment: OR=0.73; 95% CI, 0.65-0.82; highest vs lowest tertile: OR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.58). Incorporation of each eCRF measure into a conventional risk prediction model modestly improved discrimination. Conclusion Estimated CRF derived from validated nonexercise equations was similarly and inversely associated with incident CMM in older adults, with all models reporting comparable modest predictive utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunutsor et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Older adults free of cardiometabolic disease (n=3,326). Estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) vs. Lower estimated cardiorespiratory fitness was evaluated on Incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.87). Higher estimated cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a 22% lower odds of incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity per 1-MET increment in older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: