Assesses treatment patterns and outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, implying varied clinical approaches are needed.
This study assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received second- (2 L), third- (3 L), and fourth-line (4 L) treatments. Among 3910 patients who received 2 L treatment, 42.6% and 20.4% went on to receive 3 L and 4 L treatment, respectively. Median age of patients who received 2 L treatment was 70 years. Before 2 L treatment, most patients had exposure to bortezomib (77.0%) and lenalidomide (70.0%). The most common 2 L regimens (±dexamethasone) were daratumumab + pomalidomide (7.7%), daratumumab + lenalidomide (7.6%), and daratumumab + bortezomib (6.0%); daratumumab + pomalidomide was most common in 3 L (11.3%) and 4 L (8.3%). Median progression-free survival was 13.8, 8.1, and 7.0 months and median overall survival was 61.3, 39.9, and 30.7 months in 2 L, 3 L, and 4 L, respectively. By multivariable Cox regression, worse-outcome predictors included higher International Staging System stage, frailty, high cytogenetic risk, and triple-class refractoriness. Overall, real-world treatment patterns for RRMM were heterogeneous, and new therapies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nieto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: