Registry-based study estimates regrafting probability in children with cleft alveolus, highlighting treatment center impact.
Objective Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is a key surgical intervention for children with cleft alveolus. We aim to estimate the cumulative probability of bone regrafting after SABG and assess associated clinical predictive factors. Design Registry-based study. Setting National registry-based study using the Norwegian Registry of Cleft Lip and Palate (NRCLP), covering cleft care in Norway, 2011 to 2024. Patients/Participants Children with cleft alveolus recorded in the NRCLP (n = 590). Interventions Secondary alveolar bone grafting and any subsequent regrafting within the cleft care. Main outcome measure(s) Bone regrafting cumulative probability after SABG, based on 2-dimensional radiographic Bergland classification system, and its associations with sex, center of treatment, palate involvement, cleft side, and cleft type. Results Of 590 children, 398 (67%) were boys. Unilateral cleft alveolus (with/without cleft palate) was identified among 479 (81%) children. A total of 178 (30%) had cleft lip and alveolus only, and 412 (70%) had cleft lip and alveolus with cleft palate. Secondary alveolar bone grafting was performed in 219 clefts among 191 children. The mean age at first SABG was 9.8 ± 1.1 years. Fourteen children (7%) underwent regrafting. The cumulative probability of regrafting was 10% (95% confidence interval, 6%-16%) up to 6 years of follow-up. Regrafting was not significantly associated with sex, palate involvement, cleft side, or cleft type ( P > .05). It was associated with the center of treatment ( P = .015). Conclusions Regrafting cumulative probability after SABG was low. No significant associations were identified with the cleft characteristics examined. Variation between centers warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: