Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article analyzes East-Central Europe's role in global hierarchies, suggesting new perspectives on dependency theory.
This article advances dependency theory by rethinking the place of East-Central Europe (ECE) within contemporary global hierarchies of development. Its contribution to the revitalized neo-dependency literature is threefold. First, it reclassifies ECE as a consolidated, developmentally mobile semi-periphery that has achieved strong sectoral upgrading across both manufacturing and high-tech services. Second, it demonstrates that this upgrading is inseparable from the EU integration regime: regulatory harmonization, fiscal transfers, and legal embedding in the Single Market generate developmental dynamics that thinner or more transactional arrangements cannot replicate, making the structure of external anchoring a key explanatory variable. Third, by situating ECE in a systematic global comparison with semi-peripheries across Asia, Latin America, as well as with Europe’s non-EU neighborhood, it shows that pessimistic structuralist dependency perspectives require further revision. From these vantage points, the article outlines a research agenda connecting the revitalized comparative dependency literature with the ECE political economy scholarship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simons et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: