Reveals insights on shock metamorphism in coesite glass, indicating geochronological implications.
We present the first micrometer‐scale, phase‐resolved compositional characterization of impact melt glass from the Hapcheon crater (~1.4 km apparent diameter), the first confirmed impact structure on the Korean Peninsula, integrating EPMA‐WDS (5 μm spot), confocal Raman spectroscopy (<1 μm spot), XRD, and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar step‐heating geochronology. EPMA of 37 points resolves three compositionally distinct groups separated by a clear compositional gap: silica‐glass cores (CORE; n = 23; 98.4 wt% SiO 2 , K 2 O 0.023 wt%), feldspathic–mafic mantling glass (MANTLE; n = 6; ~55 wt% SiO 2 , K 2 O 2.24 wt%), and feldspathic glass clasts (UNCERTAIN; n = 8; ~61 wt% SiO 2 , K 2 O 3.10 wt%), demonstrating phase‐segregated melting of the quartz and feldspathic–mafic fractions of the Cretaceous Dongmyeong target rock rather than whole‐rock homogenization. Confocal Raman spectroscopy confirms coesite in 74% of 34 spectra and identifies diaplectic quartz glass, documenting micrometer‐scale shock heterogeneity; a 30‐point colocation data set confirms coesite within the ultralow‐K 2 O glass phase. The ultralow K 2 O causes systematic 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age overestimation through inherited 40 Ar; all seven plateau ages (1.8–5.6 Ma) exceed the independent 10 Be burial age of 1.33 Ma. Step‐heating Ca/K systematics confirm multiphase assemblages, and inverse‐isochron 40 Ar/ 36 Ar intercepts independently corroborate inherited 40 Ar. The youngest compositionally anchored age brackets the impact at 1.33–3.07 Ma (Plio‐Pleistocene).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: