Demonstrates improved uncertainty quantification in remaining useful life prediction, indicating enhanced decision support for complex systems.
Remaining Useful Life prediction is a core challenge in the field of Prognostics and Health Management. Traditional point prediction methods only provide a single estimate and cannot quantify prediction uncertainty, limiting their application in critical decision-making. This paper proposes a probabilistic prediction model integrating an LSTM–attention mechanism and quantile regression, aiming to achieve interval prediction and uncertainty quantification for RUL. The model employs a bidirectional LSTM network to capture temporal dependencies, focuses on key degradation features through a six-head self-attention mechanism, and outputs predictions for three quantiles (10%, 50%, 90%) simultaneously based on the quantile regression framework, constructing an 80% confidence interval with clear physical meaning. Experimental validation on a public dataset shows that the proposed model performs excellently in both point prediction accuracy and interval prediction quality: RMSE reaches 11.245, NASA Score is 166.414, while the interval coverage remains at 86.7%, and the interval width is 30.398. Ablation experiments further confirm the importance of each component, where removing the attention mechanism causes a 24.4% increase in RMSE, and removing the LSTM module worsens the NASA Score by 164.8%. The research results provide an effective solution for probabilistic remaining life prediction of complex equipment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: