Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Turbulent events of the last 9 years on the Russian alcohol scene became the subject of special attention in the expert community. Among the papers dedicated to the alcohol events, we should pay attention to the article ‘Effect of Specific Alcohol Control Policy Measures on the Level of Alcohol-Related Mortality in Russia from 1998 to 2013’ by Khaltourina and Korotayev (2015). The authors analyzed the trends following several parameters: rate of spirits and vodka production, vodka sales level and mortality due to acute alcohol poisoning, male and total mortality rates. They correlated these parameters to the adoption of different laws that regulate alcohol market and concluded that ‘The effect of the policy measures introduced in 2006 lasted through the following years’ (p. 8). Let us see if it is true. Anti-alcohol activity in this country began with the adoption of two laws in 2005. The first one (102—FL), among other issues, introduced new excise stamps from January 1, 2006. After that time, other stamps have been prohibited. The second law (209—FL) significantly increased nominal capital of alcohol market players since July 1, 2006, so that the market became free from small and average players in favor of large producers. Moreover, the law 209 introduced new and more toxic denaturant additives for household alcohol-containing liquids after July 1, 2006. The introduction of new excise stamps has been a routine procedure: since 1994, they have been changed seven times (1994, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2003 and 2005) and differed only in their protection …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nemtsov et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: