Key result
This study protocol describes a prospective cohort study to evaluate whether mAFA III-supported structured rehabilitation improves guideline adherence in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether mAFA III-supported structured follow-up rehabilitation packages adapted to patient risk profiles and treatment patterns would improve guideline adherence and reduce adverse cardiovascular events.
Does mAFA III-supported structured rehabilitation improve guideline adherence to the ABC pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=1,475)
Does mAFA III-supported structured rehabilitation improve guideline adherence to the ABC pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This protocol outlines a prospective cohort study to evaluate whether a mobile app-supported structured rehabilitation program improves guideline adherence to the ABC pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Adapted mAFA III packages for AF subgroups need validation; leaves open incremental benefit over standard ABC pathway.
Background: Guideline-recommended integrated care based on the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway for "general" patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) improves clinical outcomes, as demonstrated in our prior mobile Atrial Fibrillation Application (mAFA)-II cluster randomized trial. The present study aims to investigate whether mAFA III-supported structured follow-up rehabilitation packages adapted to patient risk profiles and different treatment patterns (eg, for patients receiving drug treatment only, AF ablation, or left atrial appendage occlusion [LAAO]) will improve guideline adherence and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Methods and Analysis: In this prospective, observational mAFA III pilot cohort study, patients with AF aged ≥ 18 years will be enrolled using the mAFA III App for self-management. Assuming an annual rate of composite outcome of "ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism, all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalization" of 29.3% for non-ABC pathway compliance compared with 20.8% for ABC pathway compliance, at least 1475 patients would be needed to detect the outcome of the A, B and C components of the ABC pathway, assuming a withdrawal rate of 20% in the first year. The primary endpoint is adherence to guidelines regarding the A, B and C components of the ABC pathway. Ancillary analyses will be performed to determine the impact of the ABC pathway using smart technologies on the outcomes among the "high-risk" population (eg, ≥75 years old, with multimorbidities, with polypharmacy) and the application of artificial intelligence machine-learning AF risk prediction management in assessing AF recurrence. The individualised anticoagulants with AF burden will be monitored by smart devices. Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN13724416.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,475). mAFA III-supported structured follow-up rehabilitation packages was evaluated on Adherence to guidelines regarding the A, B and C components of the ABC pathway. This study protocol describes a prospective cohort study to evaluate whether mAFA III-supported structured rehabilitation improves guideline adherence in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: