Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Study Aim. Sport-specific interval training is commonly incorporated into badminton conditioning programs to address the demands of repeated intensive actions performed during play. Training interventions focusing on the integration of sport-specific movement patterns under intermittent loading conditions are applied to influence performance-related outcomes during training and competition. Despite the use of different conditioning approaches, their relative effectiveness when integrated into regular training through sport-specific movement patterns remains a matter of practical interest. This study aimed to examine the effects of integrating an 8-week badminton-specific high-intensity interval training (BS-HIIT) program on agility and intermittent endurance in junior badminton athletes. Materials and Methods. Forty competitive junior badminton athletes (13–17 years) were allocated to either a BS-HIIT group (n = 20) or a control group performing conventional conditioning (n = 20). Both groups trained twice weekly for eight weeks, in addition to regular technical training. The BS-HIIT protocol consisted of court-based, multidirectional movements replicating badminton footwork at 85–95% HR_max, whereas the control group performed general aerobic and agility-based conditioning. Agility was assessed using the Badminton Shuttle Run Agility Test (BSRAT), and intermittent endurance was evaluated using the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1). A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, effect size calculations, correlation analysis, and responder analysis were conducted. Results. Significant group × time interactions were observed for agility (η²_p = 0.58) and intermittent endurance (η²_p = 0.62). The BS-HIIT group demonstrated greater improvements in agility (−7.29%) and Yo-Yo IR1 performance (+31.4%) compared with the control group (−2.58% and +10.8%, respectively). A significant correlation between changes in intermittent endurance and agility was found only in the BS-HIIT group (r = −0.64, p = 0.002). A higher proportion of high responders was also observed following BS-HIIT. Conclusions. An 8-week badminton-specific HIIT program is more effective than conventional conditioning in improving agility and intermittent endurance in junior badminton athletes. Integrating sport-specific movement patterns within high-intensity conditioning appears to promote transferable and consistent performance adaptations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kusuma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: