Key result
Safety net hospitals had a 0.03 percentage points greater quarterly decline in 30-day standardized readmission rates compared to non-safety net hospitals from 2008 to 2015 (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does safety net hospital status affect the trend of 30-day readmission rates under the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program compared to non-safety net hospitals in Medicare patients?
Observational (n=52,516,213)
Yes
Does safety net hospital status affect the trend of 30-day readmission rates under the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program compared to non-safety net hospitals in Medicare patients?
Mean Difference: 0.03 (95% CI 0.02–0.03)
Absolute Event Rate: 13.6% vs 12.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Safety net hospitals experienced a more rapid decrease in readmission rates than non-safety net hospitals following the implementation of the HRRP.
Supports equitable HRRP progress for vulnerable populations; leaves open causal drivers given observational design.
OBJECTIVE: To compare trends in readmission rates among safety net and non-safety net hospitals under the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP). DESIGN: A retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from January 2008 to June 2015. SETTING: We examined 3254 US hospitals eligible for penalties under the HRRP, categorised as safety net or non-safety net hospitals based on the hospital's proportion of patients with low socioeconomic status. PARTICIPANTS: Admissions for Medicare fee-for-service patients, age ≥65 years, discharged alive, who had a valid five-digit zip code and did not have a principal discharge diagnosis of cancer or psychiatric illness were included, for a total of 52 516 213 index admissions. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean hospital-level, all-condition, 30-day risk-adjusted standardised unplanned readmission rate, measured quarterly, along with quarterly rate of change, and an interrupted time series examining: April-June 2010, after HRRP was passed, and October-December 2012, after HRRP penalties were implemented. RESULTS: 58.0% (SD 15.3) of safety net hospitals and 17.1% (SD 10.4) of non-safety net hospitals' patients were in the lowest quartile of socioeconomic status. The mean safety net hospital standardised readmission rate declined from 17.0% (SD 3.7) to 13.6% (SD 3.6), whereas the mean non-safety net hospital declined from 15.4% (SD 3.0) to 12.7% (SD 2.5). The absolute difference in rates between safety net and non-safety net hospitals declined from 1.6% (95% CI 1.3 to 1.9) to 0.9% (0.7 to 1.2). The quarterly decline in standardised readmission rates was 0.03 percentage points (95% CI 0.03 to 0.02, p<0.001) greater among safety net hospitals over the entire study period, and no differential change among safety net and non-safety net hospitals was found after either HRRP was passed or penalties enacted. CONCLUSIONS: Since HRRP was passed and penalties implemented, readmission rates for safety net hospitals have decreased more rapidly than those for non-safety net hospitals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salerno et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Medicare fee-for-service patients (n=52,516,213). Safety net hospitals vs. Non-safety net hospitals was evaluated on Mean hospital-level, all-condition, 30-day risk-adjusted standardised unplanned readmission rate (MD 0.03 percentage points greater quarterly decline, 95% CI 0.02-0.03, p=<0.001). Safety net hospitals had a 0.03 percentage points greater quarterly decline in 30-day standardized readmission rates compared to non-safety net hospitals from 2008 to 2015 (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: