Key result
EMS prenotification for neurointerventional teams is linked to ~22-minute faster door-to-puncture times in thrombectomy.
Why the study?
Do Target Stroke Phase III quality improvement strategies reduce door-to-puncture time in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Cohort
Yes
Do Target Stroke Phase III quality improvement strategies reduce door-to-puncture time in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Specific Target Stroke Phase III strategies, such as EMS prenotification and routine CT/CTA imaging, are associated with significantly accelerated door-to-puncture times for ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.
BACKGROUND: The Target Stroke Phase III program is a national quality improvement initiative led by the American Heart Association, which sought to improve the quality of care for patients with acute stroke undergoing acute reperfusion therapy including endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study was performed using data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program between January 1, 2017, and March 31, 2022. Three categories of patients were analyzed: (1) patients who arrived directly at the thrombectomy hospital and had EVT, (2) patients who were transferred in from a nonthrombectomy hospital and had EVT, and (3) patients at a nonthrombectomy hospital who were potentially eligible for EVT, received intravenous thrombolysis, and were transferred out. The primary end point of this study for thrombectomy hospitals was door-to-puncture time. RESULTS: In direct-arriving EVT patients, 2 Target Stroke Phase III strategies were independently associated with shorter door-to-puncture time: (1) alerting the neurointerventional team based on emergency medical services prenotification (-21.9 [95% CI, -42.5 to -1.3] minutes) and (2) performance of a brain computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in all patients presenting ≤24 hours from time last known well (-6.6 [95% CI, -11.8 to -1.5] minutes). In transfer-in EVT patients, 2 Target Stroke Phase III strategies were independently associated with a shorter door-to-puncture time: (1) increased use of stroke screening tools (-3.5 [95% CI, -6.4 to -0.6] minutes per 25% increase in use of the screening tool) and (2) increased use of a camera during telestroke consultations (-5.8 [95% CI, -10.7 to -0.9] minutes per 25% increase in camera use). CONCLUSIONS: Several Target Stroke Phase III strategies are associated with more timely care, which are distinctly different for thrombectomy and nonthrombectomy hospitals and for patients arriving by emergency medical services compared with interfacility transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grory et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Target Stroke Phase III strategies vs. Non-implementation or lower utilization of strategies was evaluated on door-to-puncture time (MD -21.9 minutes, 95% CI -42.5 to -1.3). Alerting the neurointerventional team based on EMS prenotification reduced door-to-puncture time by 21.9 minutes for direct-arriving endovascular thrombectomy patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: