Key result
A UNet++ ensemble algorithm for carotid plaque segmentation demonstrated strong correlation with manual measurements (r = 0.972-0.988, p < 0.001) across different datasets without retraining.
Why the study?
Deep learning provides automatic carotid plaque segmentation and total-plaque-area measurement for stroke risk and progression monitoring, but requires large annotated datasets with unknown generalizability to new datasets.
Effect estimate: r = 0.972 to 0.988
p-value: p=<0.001
A deep learning UNet++ ensemble algorithm can accurately and precisely segment carotid plaques and measure total plaque area from 2D ultrasound images, performing comparably to manual annotation.
Supports AI-assisted plaque analysis in research; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Measurement of total-plaque-area (TPA) is important for determining long term risk for stroke and monitoring carotid plaque progression. Since delineation of carotid plaques is required, a deep learning method can provide automatic plaque segmentations and TPA measurements; however, it requires large datasets and manual annotations for training with unknown performance on new datasets. A UNet++ ensemble algorithm was proposed to segment plaques from 2D carotid ultrasound images, trained on three small datasets (n = 33, 33, 34 subjects) and tested on 44 subjects from the SPARC dataset (n = 144, London, Canada). The ensemble was also trained on the entire SPARC dataset and tested with a different dataset (n = 497, Zhongnan Hospital, China). Algorithm and manual segmentations were compared using Dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), and TPAs were compared using the difference (ΔTPA), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and Bland-Altman analyses. Segmentation variability was determined using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient-of-variation (CoV). For 44 SPARC subjects, algorithm DSC was 83.3-85.7%, and algorithm TPAs were strongly correlated (r = 0.985-0.988; p <; 0.001) with manual results with marginal biases (0.73-6.75) mm² using the three training datasets. Algorithm ICC for TPAs (ICC = 0.996) was similar to intra- and inter-observer manual results (ICC = 0.977, 0.995). Algorithm CoV = 6.98% for plaque areas was smaller than the inter-observer manual CoV (7.54%). For the Zhongnan dataset, DSC was 88.6% algorithm and manual TPAs were strongly correlated (r = 0.972, p <; 0.001) with ΔTPA = -0.44±4.05 mm² and ICC = 0.985. The proposed algorithm trained on small datasets and segmented a different dataset without retraining with accuracy and precision that may be useful clinically and for research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2021) studied Carotid plaque (n=641). UNet++ ensemble algorithm vs. Manual segmentations was evaluated on Dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC) and Pearson correlation (r) for total plaque area (r = 0.972 to 0.988, p=<0.001). A UNet++ ensemble algorithm for carotid plaque segmentation demonstrated strong correlation with manual measurements (r = 0.972-0.988, p < 0.001) across different datasets without retraining.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: