Key result
Generic dabigatran (okanadab) did not differ significantly from branded dabigatran (pradaxa) in pharmacokinetic parameters in a bioequivalence study.
Why the study?
Dabigatran etexilate mesylate quickly converts to dabigatran after oral administration, making its plasma detection practically unmanageable and requiring a validated method to quantify free and total dabigatran for bioequivalence testing.
Is generic dabigatran (okanadab) bioequivalent to branded dabigatran (pradaxa) in human participants?
Is generic dabigatran (okanadab) bioequivalent to branded dabigatran (pradaxa) in human participants?
A newly developed UPLC-MS/MS method successfully quantified dabigatran in human plasma and demonstrated bioequivalence between generic okanadab and branded pradaxa.
May support generic dabigatran access for cost savings; leaves open outcome trials in clinical practice.
Dabigatran etexilate mesylate (DABE), a prodrug, quickly changes into dabigatran (DAB) after its oral administration. Accordingly, detecting DABE in plasma is practically unmanageable. An ultraperformance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS) technique was developed and validated to compute free DAB in participants. For the first time, the central composite design, a type of response surface methodology, was applied for optimizing variables affecting the cleavage of glucuronide bond. In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters of generic medication (okanadab) were determined, and the obtained outcomes were compared with those of the branded drug (pradaxa). The sample preparation was done using methanol as a protein precipitant and the separation was achieved using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C 18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm). The elution was isocratically conducted using 10 mM ammonium formate:methanol (72:28, v/v) as a mobile phase and the flow rate was 0.25 mL/min. Multiple reaction monitoring and positive electrospray ionization were used. The determination was performed within 1 min, and the calibration growth curve was established over a range of 1.19–475 ng/mL using DAB‐d3 as a tagged internal standard. Bioequivalence research was validated following the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) guidelines for bioanalytical procedures and acceptable outcomes were achieved. The outcomes for okanadab and pradaxa did not differ significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abd-Allah et al. (2022) studied this question. okanadab (generic dabigatran) vs. pradaxa (branded dabigatran) was evaluated on pharmacokinetic parameters. Generic dabigatran (okanadab) did not differ significantly from branded dabigatran (pradaxa) in pharmacokinetic parameters in a bioequivalence study.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: