Key result
Enteroviruses have developed sophisticated strategies to evade host antiviral innate immune responses triggered through pathogen recognition receptors.
This review summarizes the interplay between host innate immune responses and enterovirus infection, focusing on viral evasion strategies.
Enterovirus myocarditis mechanisms need clarification; review leaves open targeted immunomodulatory strategies.
Enterovirus genus includes multiple important human pathogens, such as poliovirus, coxsackievirus, enterovirus (EV) A71, EV-D68 and rhinovirus. Infection with EVs can cause numerous clinical conditions including poliomyelitis, meningitis and encephalitis, hand-foot-and-mouth disease, acute flaccid paralysis, diarrhea, myocarditis and respiratory illness. EVs, which are positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses, trigger activation of the host antiviral innate immune responses through pathogen recognition receptors such as retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG-I)-likeand Toll-like receptors. In turn, EVs have developed sophisticated strategies to evade host antiviral responses. In this review, we discuss the interplay between the host innate immune responses and EV infection, with a primary focus on host immune detection and protection against EV infection and viral strategies to evade these antiviral immune responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2016) conducted a review in Enterovirus infection. Enterovirus infection was evaluated. Enteroviruses have developed sophisticated strategies to evade host antiviral innate immune responses triggered through pathogen recognition receptors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: