Key result
Whole abdomen MRI measures of adipose tissue demonstrated better scan-to-scan reproducibility (RMS CoV 4.16% and 3.61%) compared to partial abdomen measures (6.31% and 5.07%).
Why the study?
Does whole abdomen MRI quantification of adipose tissue improve correlation with BMI and reproducibility compared to partial abdomen methods in healthy volunteers?
Cross-Sectional (n=15)
Does whole abdomen MRI quantification of adipose tissue improve correlation with BMI and reproducibility compared to partial abdomen methods in healthy volunteers?
Whole abdomen MRI measures of adiposity are more reproducible and better correlated with BMI than partial abdomen measures, making them preferable for longitudinal studies.
Whole-abdomen MRI may enhance longitudinal adiposity tracking; extends reproducibility data but leaves open validation in clinical cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: To explore "whole abdomen" MRI methods for quantifying adipose tissue volumes and to establish associations with body mass index (BMI) and measurement reproducibility-relative to existing "partial abdomen" methods. METHODS: 15 healthy volunteers were scanned on a 3T MRI scanner using a double-echo three-point-Dixon gradient echo sequence. Whole abdomen volumes were acquired via three separate scans ("supine 1", "supine 2" and "prone"). Segmentation was applied to derive (i) "whole abdomen" visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) volumes, and (ii) "partial abdomen" volumes at the lumbar spine (L3 to L5). Root-mean-square coefficients of variation (RMS CoV) were calculated to quantify the variability of each measurement. RESULTS: = 0.33) for both methods. Scan-to-scan RMS CoV's for "whole abdomen" VAT and SCAT measurements were 4.16 and 3.61% compared to 6.31 and 5.07% for "partial abdomen" measurements. CONCLUSION: "Whole abdomen" measures of abdominal adiposity are better correlated with BMI and demonstrate better scan-to-scan reproducibility than "partial abdomen" measures. It is recommended that "whole abdomen" measures be used in longitudinal MRI radiology investigations, where small volume changes may occur. Advances in knowledge: Whole abdomen adipose tissue volumes can be measured and quantified using commercial MRI sequences and post-processing software. These methods are better correlated with BMI and are more reproducible than partial abdomen measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marzetti et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=15). Whole abdomen MRI vs. Partial abdomen MRI was evaluated on Scan-to-scan reproducibility (RMS CoV) for visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Whole abdomen MRI measures of adipose tissue demonstrated better scan-to-scan reproducibility (RMS CoV 4.16% and 3.61%) compared to partial abdomen measures (6.31% and 5.07%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: