Key result
A low Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (<92) was associated with significantly lower amputation-free survival compared to a high GNRI (≥92) in patients with peripheral artery disease (P<0.001).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the associations of the geriatric nutritional risk index with mortality and amputation-free survival in patients with peripheral artery disease.
Does a low Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) predict worse mortality and amputation-free survival in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing endovascular treatment?
Cohort (n=295)
No
Does a low Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) predict worse mortality and amputation-free survival in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing endovascular treatment?
A low Geriatric nutritional risk index is associated with an increased risk of mortality and limb events in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing endovascular treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GNRI may aid risk stratification in PAD; hypothesis-generating for nutritional interventions, with prospective trials needed.
Background Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) was developed as a “nutrition-related” risk index and was reported in different populations as associated with the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the associations of GNRI with mortality and amputation free survival in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods From January 2011 to June 2016, 295 consecutive patients (73.3±9.2 years; 75.6% male) with PAD undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in our hospital were retrospectively examined. The GNRI on admission was calculated as follows: 14.89 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 41.7 × body mass index (BMI)/22. Characteristics and mortality were compared between 2 groups: low GNRI (<92, n=110) with moderate or severe nutritional risk; and high GNRI (≥92, n=185) with no or low nutritional risk. Results The median follow up period was 39.4±26.4months. There were 85 deaths (28.8%) and 13 major amputation (4.4%) during the follow-up. Patients in the low-GNRI group were more often higher age, non-ambulatory state, hemodialysis and critical limb ischemia. BMI, serum hemoglobin, albumin, low-density lipoprotein were significantly lower, whereas serum C-reactive protein was significantly higher in the low-GNRI group than the high-GNRI group (P<0.05, respectively). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients in the low-GNRI group had a significantly lower amputation free survival, compared to those in the high-GNRI group (log-rank test, P<0.001). Conclusion The low GNRI is associated with an increased risk of mortality and limb events in patients with PAD. Amputation-free survival (Kaplan-Meier)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horiguchi et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Peripheral artery disease (PAD) (n=295). Low Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI <92) vs. High GNRI (≥92) was evaluated on Amputation-free survival (p=<0.001). A low Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (<92) was associated with significantly lower amputation-free survival compared to a high GNRI (≥92) in patients with peripheral artery disease (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: