Key result
Three-dimensional echocardiography provides more accurate and reproducible measurements of left ventricular volumes and function than two-dimensional echocardiography, showing closer agreement with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Why the study?
Does three-dimensional echocardiography provide accurate and reproducible quantitative evaluation of left ventricular function and size compared to 2D echocardiography and CMR?
Does three-dimensional echocardiography provide accurate and reproducible quantitative evaluation of left ventricular function and size compared to 2D echocardiography and CMR?
Three-dimensional echocardiography has evolved into a simple, fast, and accurate imaging modality for everyday clinical evaluation of left ventricular function and size.
May support 3DE preference for LV quantification; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
One of the earliest applications of clinical echocardiography is evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function and size. Accurate, reproducible and quantitative evaluation of LV function and size is vital for diagnosis, treatment and prediction of prognosis of heart disease. Early three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic techniques showed better reproducibility than two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography and narrower limits of agreement for assessment of LV function and size in comparison to reference methods, mostly cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, but acquisition methods were cumbersome and a lack of user-friendly analysis software initially precluded widespread use. Through the advent of matrix transducers enabling real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) and improvements in analysis software featuring semi-automated volumetric analysis, 3D echocardiography evolved into a simple and fast imaging modality for everyday clinical use. 3DE provides the possibility to evaluate the entire LV in three spatial dimensions during the complete cardiac cycle, offering a more accurate and complete quantitative evaluation the LV. Improved efficiency in acquisition and analysis may provide clinicians with important diagnostic information within minutes. The current article reviews the methodology and application of 3DE for quantitative evaluation of the LV, provides the scientific evidence for its current clinical use, and discusses its current limitations and potential future directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heide et al. (2011) conducted a review in Left ventricular quantification. Three-dimensional echocardiography vs. Two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance was evaluated. Three-dimensional echocardiography provides more accurate and reproducible measurements of left ventricular volumes and function than two-dimensional echocardiography, showing closer agreement with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: