Key result
Crosslinking the actin-binding cleft of myosin with a bifunctional spin-label weakens binding, eliminates actin activation, and traps an actomyosin state with intermediate structural dynamics.
Restricting the actin-binding cleft of myosin traps an intermediate state at the threshold of force generation, providing insight into actomyosin structural dynamics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advances understanding of actomyosin intermediates; leaves open whether cleft restriction can be leveraged in cardiac models.
We have trapped the catalytic domain of Dictyostelium ( Dicty ) myosin II in a weak actin-binding conformation by chemically crosslinking two engineered cysteines across the actin-binding cleft, using a bifunctional spin label (BSL). By connecting the lower and upper 50 kDa domains of myosin, the crosslink restricts the conformation of the actin-binding cleft. Crosslinking has no effect on the basal ATPase activity of isolated myosin, but it impairs rigor actin binding and actin-activation of myosin ATPase. EPR spectra of BSL provide insight into actomyosin structural dynamics. BSL is highly immobilized within the actin-binding cleft and is thus exquisitely sensitive to the global orientation and rotational motions of the myosin head. Conventional EPR shows that myosin heads bound to oriented actin filaments are highly disordered with respect to the actin filament axis, in contrast to the nearly crystalline order of myosin heads in rigor. This disorder is similar to that of weakly bound heads induced by ATP, but saturation transfer EPR shows that the disorder of crosslinked myosin is at least 100 times slower. Thus this cleft-crosslinked myosin is remarkably similar, in both actin affinity and rotational dynamics, to SH1-SH2 crosslinked BSL-myosin S1. We conclude that, whether myosin is trapped at the actin-myosin interface or in the force-generating region between the active site and lever arm, the structural state of myosin is intermediate between the weak-binding state preceding phosphate release and the strong-binding state that succeeds it. We propose that it represents the threshold of force generation. Background: The actin-binding cleft of myosin is proposed to close upon force generation. Results: Crosslinking the cleft with a bifunctional spin-label weakens binding, eliminates actin activation, and disorders the actomyosin interface. Conclusion: Restricting the cleft traps an actomyosin state with structural dynamics intermediate between strongly and weakly bound. Significance: We have determined the structural dynamics of an elusive intermediate at the threshold of force generation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moen et al. (2012) studied this question. Chemically crosslinking two engineered cysteines across the actin-binding cleft using a bifunctional spin label (BSL) was evaluated on Actin affinity and rotational dynamics. Crosslinking the actin-binding cleft of myosin with a bifunctional spin-label weakens binding, eliminates actin activation, and traps an actomyosin state with intermediate structural dynamics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: