Key result
The FibriCheck smartphone application will be evaluated for its effect on the detection rate of atrial fibrillation compared to opportunistic screening in a planned cluster randomized trial.
Why the study?
Current primary care AF screening with pulse palpation and ECG confirmation often misses paroxysmal AF, whereas smartphone apps may enable more cost-efficient screening.
Does a smartphone-based application improve the detection rate of atrial fibrillation compared to standard opportunistic screening in primary care patients above 65 years of age?
RCT (n=8,765)
Open-label
Simple balanced randomization (1:1) at the cluster level
Yes
Does a smartphone-based application improve the detection rate of atrial fibrillation compared to standard opportunistic screening in primary care patients above 65 years of age?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This protocol outlines a cluster randomized trial to evaluate whether a smartphone app improves atrial fibrillation detection rates in older primary care patients compared to standard opportunistic screening.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a cardiac arrhythmia commonly encountered in a primary care setting. Current screening is limited to pulse palpation and ECG confirmation when an irregular pulse is found. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will, however, still be difficult to pick up. With the advent of smartphones, screening could be more cost-efficient by making use of simple applications, lowering the need for intensive screening to discover (paroxysmal) atrial fibrillation. METHODS/DESIGN: This cluster randomized trial will examine the effect of using a smartphone-based application such as FibriCheck® on the detection rate of atrial fibrillation in a Flemish general practice population. This study will be conducted in 22 primary care practices across the Flanders region of Belgium and will last 12 months. Patients above 65 years of age will be divided in control and intervention groups on the practice level. The control group will be subjected to standard opportunistic screening only, while the intervention group will be prescribed the FibriCheck® app on top of this opportunistic screening. The difference in detection rate between control and intervention groups will be calculated at the end of the study. We will use the online platform INTEGO for pseudonymized data collection and analysis, and risk calculation. DISCUSSION: Smartphone applications might offer a way to cost-effectively screen for (paroxysmal) atrial fibrillation in a primary care setting. This could open the door for the update of future screening guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04545723 . Registered on September 10, 2020.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beerten et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=8,765). FibriCheck smartphone application vs. Standard opportunistic screening (pulse palpation and 12-lead ECG if irregular) was evaluated on Detection rate of atrial fibrillation. The FibriCheck smartphone application will be evaluated for its effect on the detection rate of atrial fibrillation compared to opportunistic screening in a planned cluster randomized trial.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: