Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The recall of CD8(+) T-cell memory established by infecting H-2(b) mice with an H1N1 influenza A virus provided a measure of protection against an extremely virulent H7N7 virus. The numbers of CD8(+) effector and memory T cells specific for the shared, immunodominant D(b)NP(366) epitope were greatly increased subsequent to the H7N7 challenge, and though lung titers remained as high as those in naive controls for 5 days or more, the virus was cleared more rapidly. Expanding the CD8(+) memory T-cell pool (<0.5 to >10%) by sequential priming with two different influenza A viruses (H3N2-->H1N1) gave much better protection. Though the H7N7 virus initially grew to equivalent titers in the lungs of naive and double-primed mice, the replicative phase was substantially controlled within 3 days. This tertiary H7N7 challenge caused little increase in the magnitude of the CD8(+) D(b)NP(366)(+) T-cell pool, and only a portion of the memory population in the lymphoid tissue could be shown to proliferate. The great majority of the CD8(+) D(b)NP(366)(+) set that localized to the infected respiratory tract had, however, cycled at least once, though recent cell division was shown not to be a prerequisite for T-cell extravasation. The selective induction of CD8(+) T-cell memory can thus greatly limit the damage caused by a virulent influenza A virus, with the extent of protection being directly related to the number of available responders. Furthermore, a large pool of CD8(+) memory T cells may be only partially utilized to deal with a potentially lethal influenza infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christensen et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: