Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Their enantioseparation abilities were then examined as chiral stationary phases (CSPs) for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after they were coated on 3-aminopropyl silica gels. Investigations indicated that the substituents at the 3- and 6-positions played an important role in chiral recognition of these amylose 2-benzoate serial derivatives. The derivatives demonstrated characteristic enantioseparation and some racemates were better resolved on these derivatives than on Chiralpak AD, which is one of the most efficient CSPs, utilizing coated amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) as the chiral selector. Among the derivatives prepared, amylose 2-benzoate-3-(phenylcarbamate/4-methylphenylcarbamate)-6-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) exhibited chiral recognition abilities comparable to that of Chiralpak AD and may be useful CSPs in the future. The effect of mobile phase on chiral recognition was also studied. In general, with the decreased concentration of 2-propanol, better resolutions were obtained with longer retention times. Moreover, when ethanol was used instead of 2-propanol, poorer resolutions were often achieved. However, in some cases, improved enantioselectivity was achieved with ethanol rather than 2-propanol as the mobile phase modifier.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: