Key result
The CanICU machine learning model predicted 28-day mortality in critically ill cancer patients with an AUROC of 0.94 internally and 0.75-0.78 externally, outperforming APACHE and SOFA scores.
Why the study?
Cancer patients are increasingly admitted to the ICU for complications, but improved mortality prediction remains a big challenge.
Does the CanICU machine learning model improve 28-day mortality prediction compared to APACHE or SOFA scores in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the ICU?
Cohort (n=6,900)
Yes
Does the CanICU machine learning model improve 28-day mortality prediction compared to APACHE or SOFA scores in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the ICU?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.94
May aid ICU mortality prediction in cancer patients; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Although cancer patients are increasingly admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for cancer- or treatment-related complications, improved mortality prediction remains a big challenge. This study describes a new ML-based mortality prediction model for critically ill cancer patients admitted to ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 2563) from 2 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. The accuracy of CanICU was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). RESULTS: A total of 6900 patients were included, with a 28-day mortality of 10.2%/12.7%/36.6% and a 1-year mortality of 30.0%/36.6%/58.5% in the YCC, SMC, and MIMIC-III cohort. Nine clinical and laboratory factors were used to construct the classifier using a random forest machine-learning algorithm. CanICU had 96% sensitivity/73% specificity with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.94 for 28-day, showing better performance than current prognostic models, including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Application of CanICU in two external data sets across the countries yielded 79-89% sensitivity, 58-59% specificity, and 0.75-0.78 AUROC for 28-day mortality. The CanICU score was also correlated with one-year mortality with 88-93% specificity. CONCLUSION: CanICU offers improved performance for predicting mortality in critically ill cancer patients admitted to ICU. A user-friendly online implementation is available and should be valuable for better mortality risk stratification to allocate ICU care for cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Critically ill cancer patients admitted to the ICU (n=6,900). CanICU machine learning mortality prediction model vs. APACHE or SOFA score was evaluated on 28-day mortality prediction (AUROC 0.94). The CanICU machine learning model predicted 28-day mortality in critically ill cancer patients with an AUROC of 0.94 internally and 0.75-0.78 externally, outperforming APACHE and SOFA scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: