Key result
The clinical benefit of tailoring P2Y12 inhibitor therapy using routine phenotypic and genotypic biomarker testing over standard of care without testing remains unproven.
Why the study?
Does tailoring P2Y12 inhibitor therapy according to routine laboratory testing improve outcomes compared to standard of care in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does tailoring P2Y12 inhibitor therapy according to routine laboratory testing improve outcomes compared to standard of care in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Routine phenotypic and genetic testing to guide clopidogrel therapy currently lacks proven clinical benefit over standard care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biomarker testing should not guide P2Y12 inhibitor selection in ACS; leaves open whether targeted trials can demonstrate benefit.
The P2Y12 inhibitors, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, are administered in fixed doses without laboratory monitoring. Randomized trials in acute coronary syndrome have shown that prasugrel and ticagrelor are more effective than standard-dose clopidogrel. Nonetheless, standard-dose clopidogrel remains widely used because it causes less bleeding and is less expensive. Patients treated with standard-dose clopidogrel have substantial variability in platelet inhibition, which is partly explained by genetic polymorphisms encoding CYP2C19, the hepatic enzyme involved in biotransformation of clopidogrel to its active metabolite. Some advocate tailoring P2Y12 inhibitor therapy according to the results of routine laboratory testing. Although there is good evidence for analytic, biological, and clinical validity of several phenotypic and genotypic biomarkers, the benefit of a management strategy that incorporates routine biomarker testing over standard of care without such testing remains unproven. Appropriately designed, adequately powered trials are needed but face the challenges of feasibility, cost, and the progressive switch from clopidogrel to prasugrel or ticagrelor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2014) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome. Phenotypic and genetic biomarker testing vs. Standard of care without testing was evaluated. The clinical benefit of tailoring P2Y12 inhibitor therapy using routine phenotypic and genotypic biomarker testing over standard of care without testing remains unproven.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: