Why the study?
Should tailored treatment of clopidogrel based on platelet function tests or CYP genotyping be implemented in the clinical setting?
Should tailored treatment of clopidogrel based on platelet function tests or CYP genotyping be implemented in the clinical setting?
Routine use of genetic and platelet function testing to tailor clopidogrel therapy is not currently recommended due to lack of test standardization and limited predictive value.
No change to clopidogrel prescribing warranted; leaves open need for standardized assays with proven predictive value.
Clopidogrel, a pro-drug whose active metabolite is an inhibitor of the platelet P2Y12 receptor, is used mostly for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. However, clopidogrel is associated with great variability in antiplatelet response, mostly caused by variable efficacy of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms, which convert clopidogrel to its active metabolite in a two-step process. Tailored treatment regimens that aim to transform all poor responders into responders have been proposed as a solution to poor responsiveness to clopidogrel. This tailored treatment is based on laboratory tests of platelet function (such as platelet aggregometry, the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay) or genotyping of CYP. However, currently there is no agreement among platelet function tests in the identification of poor responders; moreover, no standardization of these tests or guidance on how to tailor treatment effectively based on their results is available. The alternative of identifying poor responders based on CYP genotyping is also unsatisfactory, as CYP genotypes account for only about 10% of individual response to the drug. Therefore, tailoring treatment of clopidogrel should not be implemented in the clinical setting yet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Cattaneo (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: