Key result
Platelet functional testing to guide clopidogrel therapy remains controversial for predicting and managing poor response.
Why the study?
High residual platelet reactivity in patients undergoing PCI treated with antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of major cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis, prompting attempts to identify poor antiplatelet and clopidogrel response.
This review discusses the role of platelet functional testing and genetic analysis in identifying and managing poor clopidogrel response in patients undergoing PCI.
Does not support routine platelet function testing for clopidogrel; leaves open its predictive role pending higher-level evidence.
Platelet functional testing has been available to clinicians for several decades. Despite certain limitations, it has proven useful in several arenas, including diagnosing bleeding disorders, assessment of platelet-derived hemostasis and for monitoring response to antiplatelet medication. Special attention has recently been paid to high residual platelet reactivity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and being treated with antiplatelet medications, largely because of the increased risk of major cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis. In keeping with this, determining high residual platelet reactivity in patient appropriately taking aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor therapy has focused attention on tests aimed at diagnosing poor antiplatelet, and specifically clopidogrel response. Based on this, attempts to predict and intervene on poor response and its potential outcomes are prominent in the current literature, with the assistance of both platelet functional analysis and genetic deter...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiss et al. (2012) conducted a review in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions treated with antiplatelet medications. Platelet functional testing was evaluated. Platelet functional testing is used to assess high residual platelet reactivity in patients on clopidogrel, though its role in predicting and intervening on poor response remains controversial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: