Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A multidisciplinary approach was used to compare phenolic composition, radical scavenging and antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from different geographical localities, and plant resin against various microorganisms. Using UHPLC‐qqqMS quantitative analysis, 28 phenolic compounds were determined. Caffeic and p‐coumaric acids were identified as main phenolic acids in poplar propolis samples, except samples from Russia (P6) and China (P7). Radical scavenging activity (applying DPPH spectrophotometric assay) showed the highest activity of Serbian (40·51%) and Chinese (53·21%) propolis samples. Broth microdilution method was used for the oral cavity, fungal phytopathogenic and human vaginal isolates which have been identified at a molecular level. The most sensitive bacterial isolates were Lactobacillus acidophilus (MIC of 0·03–0·13 mg ml−1) and the oral streptococci isolates (MIC values of 0·19–0·13 mg ml−1). The most sensitive fungal phytopathogenic isolate was Fusarium oxysporum (MIC 0·003 mg ml−1). All samples, except propolis from Serbia (P4) and Turkey (P5), showed a strong antifungal activity against Fusarium sporotrichioides, Fusarium subglutinans and Fusarium proliferatum. The results of various tests indicate good radical scavenging and antimicrobial activity against important human and plant pathogens. A detailed propolis analysis is important when proposing a preparation of new biological antimicrobial products which have a positive impact on human health and reduce antibacterial resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ristivojević et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: